black and white – Otis Morley’s A-Level Film Studies Blog

Winter’s Bone Close-Up (“Squirrel Dream” Sequence)

Overview

The “squirrel dream” sequence of Winter’s Bone (Debra Granik, 2010) is a surreal and symbolic representation of the film’s central character, Ree. The sequence is a stark departure from the rest of the film, utilising unorthodox techniques such as black and white, grainy footage filmed with a cheap handheld camera, This serves to create a dreamscape-like atmosphere, acting as an extended metaphor for Ree, alongside the patriarchal oppression she faces over the course of the film.

Key Elements, Context, and Representation

As previously mentioned, the sequence is a striking departure from the aesthetic of the rest of the film. Granik utilises unorthodox techniques such as black and white, grainy footage filmed with a cheap handheld camera. The sequence is also shot with a vignette, 4:3 aspect ratio, furthering contributing to the surreal nature of the sequence.

*The squirrel, representing the oppressed women, is centrally framed in the dreamscape black and white 4:3 vignette*

The non-diegetic composed score, which rises in the mix, builds a pensive and ominous atmosphere, further emphasising the surreal and dreamlike quality of the sequence. The squirrel in the sequence is a metaphor for Ree, who is a victim of a disrupted naturalistic environment. The squirrel’s peaceful existence is displayed through the squirrel’s shuddering fear. The camera movements are rapid and disorienting, overwhelming the viewer and adding to the otherworldly nature of the sequence. A worms-eye-view shot of the trees is used, displaying the squirrel, and by extension, Ree, as dwarfed, emphasizing her vulnerability.

The jarring diegetic sound of a chainsaw, representing the squirrel’s impending doom, is symbolic of the masculine-oriented world that Ree is a part of, creating a sense of foreboding. The Dutch angle shot of vultures tearing at carrion symbolises Ree’s poverty-stricken way of life, with the vultures themselves representing the men in her life who cause destruction and harm. The vultures merely abandon the destruction they have caused, representing the fact that Ree must deal with the aftermath of Jessop’s disappearance. This further bolsters the feminist ideology of the film. The final shot of billowing smoke represents ultimate destruction, both physically and emotionally, underscoring the themes of poverty and struggle that pervade the film.

In conclusion, the “squirrel dream” sequence is a surreal yet powerful representation of the film’s protagonist, Ree and the struggles she must face head-on The use of visual and audio techniques creates an otherworldly, dreamlike atmosphere, enhancing the impact of the sequence on the viewer. The feminist ideology of the film is rooted in the representation of Ree as a victim of a masculine-oriented world, and the themes of poverty and struggle that pervade the film.

The Golden Age Of Hollywood: Casablanca (Michael Curtiz, 1942)

Casablanca (Michael Curtiz, 1942) is a film that arguably epitomises the landscape of filmmaking that existed in America throughout the Golden Age of Hollywood. It was produced under the context of the studio system, in which the Big Five and Little Three dominated the playing field of Hollywood, operating under a vertically integrated system.

In late 1941, Warner Bros. producer Hal B. Wallis became fascinated by an unproduced stage play called Everybody Comes to Rick’s. In late December of that same year, the studio bought the film rights for $20,000 and changed the title to Casablanca. The studio quickly began work on building bespoke sets for the film, creating the illusion of exoticism by foregrounding the lavish production values that the studio poured into the construction. Key set locations include the streets of Casablanca, the streets of Paris, and of course – Rick’s Café Americain, the primary location of the film. Each of these sets were populated with a multitude of extras in creating an artificial sense of hustle and bustle.

The film is both set and was filmed during the events of the Second World War. Because of this, executive producer Jack L. Warner pioneered the heavy wartime undertones featured throughout the film, as he vehemently believed that it would strongly encourage America to join the war effort. The final scene is particularly notable in this regard, as when Renault chooses to bin the Vichy-branded water bottle, it is symbolic of the studio’s views on fascism. Due to the ongoing war, the studio was not allowed to film at an airport after dark. Warner Bros. instead decided to film on a sound stage using a cardboard cutout of a plane – playing with perspective to create the illusion of a full-sized aeroplane.

*The Vichy water bottle is disposed of by Renault, being indicative of Warner Bros.’ views on fascism*

Casablanca was shot entirely in black and white, which was highly characteristic of Warner Bros. at the time. By 1942, colour had been implemented into a number films for around a decade, with studios such as MGM immediately choosing to embrace colour. MGM would go on to produce The Wizard of Oz (Victor Fleming, 1939) a landmark of the cutting-edge Technicolor technology, but the technology was considered by many other studios to be a ‘gimmick’. During the time of Casablanca’s release, black and white was arguably at its peak, and Warner Bros. believed that choosing to film in black and white – despite the introduction of colour technology – demonstrated artistic nuance, as the iconic ‘noir aesthetic’ had now been refined for over 50 years. Colour was not as ‘sterile’ as black and white was during this time, only being able to display highly saturated colours.

Despite the fact that Casablanca is now a landmark of American cinema, only three actors who received screen credit were born in the United States: Humphrey Bogart (Rick), Dooley Wilson (Sam), and Joy Page (Annina Brandel). All of the other actors were European exiles who had fled the war, landing themselves in Hollywood. Many of the actors who appear as Nazis in the film were in fact German Jews who had escaped from Nazi Germany, with Conrad Veidt, Major Strasser’s actor, being forced to flee Germany after the SS learned of his friendship with the Jewish community. Veidt was convinced that he was aiding the war effort by playing a Nazi villain.

Casablanca is also a product of the Golden Age of Hollywood that exemplifies the ‘stables’ of film stars owned by the studios. Due to ‘unbreakable contracts’ that exclusively contracted actors to specific studios, Warner Bros. endeavoured to make apt use of their stars, The studio chose to cast Humphrey Bogart as Rick. Throughout the Golden Age of Hollywood, Bogart was often typecast as the ‘rugged individual’ archetype in films such as The Maltese Falcon (John Huston, 1941) and Rick’s character was customised to suit Bogart’s acting capabilities.

Ilsa’s actress, Ingrid Bergman, was an internationally renowned Swedish actress known for her radiant beauty. Warner Bros. capitalised upon this by casting Bergman as Ilsa, accentuating her glamour by utilising lighting and costume design to portray Ilsa in a glamorous manner. The fact that Bergman measured two inches taller than Bogart did not align with the gender stereotypes at the time of release. Because of this, Bogart was actually made to stand on boxes during specific shots of the film to make him appear taller than Bergman.

Production Diary: La Ricotta (Pier Paolo Pasolini, 1962)

La Ricotta (Pier Paolo Pasolini, 1962) is a 35-minute Italian short film starring the acclaimed Orson Welles, who plays the director (an exaggerated impersonation of Pasolini himself) of a production of the Passion of Jesus. The main character, however, is Stracci – a penurious and starving extra on the set of the film. After attempting to scavenge the set for food, Stracci eventually finds a bountiful amount of ricotta cheese that he immediately gorges on. This turns out to be a fatal mistake, as Stracci tragically but ironically dies on the set while being ‘crucified’.

The film’s primary objective is to serve as a social commentary for the marginalisation of the poor. Pasolini believed that the poor were neglected by a society that prided themselves on being Christian. Pasolini’s portrayal of a production of the Passion is his critique of a corrupt society that is merely interested in garnering superficial reputability. This is demonstrated to the viewer through the actors’ disinterest in the production itself and their lazy and tormenting behaviour during their breaks.

Pasolini incorporates a number of techniques throughout the film in order to create meaning. Stracci’s desperation for food is conveyed to the viewer through fast-motion footage of his dire runs for food, this exaggerated physical comedy being reminiscent of Buster Keaton. In addition, the film is shot in black and white for the majority of its runtime and colour is exclusively utilised to display the production of the Passion of Jesus.

*The production of the Passion of Christ portrayed throughout La Ricotta (shot in colour)*

Due to technical difficulties, I was originally unable to extrapolate any meaning from La Ricotta and thus did not receive any sort of enjoyment from the film. After conducting research, the film’s meaning ultimately demonstrated to me the effectiveness of social commentary within a short film.

Production Diary: Pitch Black Heist (John Maclean, 2012)

Pitch Black Heist (John Maclean, 2012) is a 13-minute short film concerning a pair of professional safe crackers who embark on a heist to rob a safe from an office. However, the alarm system immediately kills the lights, obliging the duo to meticulously learn the layout of the room beforehand.

Maclean employs a number of techniques throughout the film in order to create meaning. Choosing to film in black and white symbolises the moral ambiguity of the characters and perhaps places the film as a homage to classic noir crime dramas. The setting of the film is highly authentic and grounded in reality, the only main locations being a warehouse, a pub and the office with the safe. This separates the film from high-octane heist flicks seen within mainstream cinema, and informs the viewer that it should be taken somewhat seriously. The heist itself is filmed entirely in darkness, encouraging the viewer to exclusively direct their focus on the diegetic sounds of both the dialogue and sound.

Throughout the linear three act structure the film utilises, the primary focus that the film attends to is the development between the two main characters, displayed to the viewer during the pub scene. Through an array of humorous jump-cuts which transition between the characters taking part in leisurely activities such as drinking and arm-wrestling, we soon learn that Michael is much more sincere and reserved, whereas Liam is headstrong and often insensitive. The dialogue during these scenes are both snappy and authentic, further adding to the grounded tone that the film adheres to. During this, it is revealed that Michael’s father abandoned him at a young age, which later becomes a vital plot point of the film.

*The two characters arm-wrestling, the white backdrop juxtaposes the black and grey clothes worn by the pair*

The ending of the film is rather ambiguous, during which Michael purposefully activates the alarm by lighting a cigarette. I believe the implied meaning to be that Liam is in fact Michael’s dad that abandoned him and Michael leaving him to be caught by the police is his enactment of revenge. This shocking twist allows for an unexpectedly dramatic resolution to the film and releases the tension created by the two minutes of darkness prior.

Personally, I enjoyed Pitch Black Heist to a relative extent. I particularly appreciated the grounded tone and authentic dialogue that the film had to offer. However, I believe that the plot itself was relatively disengaging until the final scene and also found the characters to be relatively uninteresting. The film demonstrated to me how shooting in complete darkness can both save time for the filmmaker and force the viewer to direct their attention exclusively on the soundscape.

Production Diary: La Jetée (Chris Marker, 1962)

Le Jetée (Chris Marker, 1962) is a 28-minute French science fiction short film. Made up almost entirely from still images, the film tells the story of a dystopian experiment involving time travel after the events of a nuclear war. Within the film, a man is assigned to delve into his past, honing in on a vague memory of a woman the protagonist briefly spotted on a jetty, before witnessing an ambiguously horrific incident. Romantic chemistry develops between the man and the woman during his time in the past, after which he is sent into the future to receive a power unit that should be used to revitalise his present-day society. After the mission is complete, the man attempts to return to the past in an attempt to locate the woman again, before realising that the horrific event he witnessed as a child was in fact his own death.

As previously mentioned, the film is constructed almost entirely from optically printed photos, sequenced together as a photo montage. Alongside this, the only dialogue heard throughout the film is voice-over narration from the protagonist, allowing the viewer to empathise with his experiences and provide expository information. The non-diegetic composed score featured throughout the film is rhythmically sequenced, an example being when the score matches a dissolve effect. Marker’s apt use of non-diegetic sound further conveys a sense of movement throughout the film that is not present on-screen.

Due to the photomontage style of filmmaking employed by Marker, the editing of the film is profoundly stylistic and further supplements the eerie dystopian setting of the film. Marker’s implementation of cut-ins and fade-outs throughout illustrates a sense of unease and uncertainty, enhancing the sci-fi genre that the film adheres to. The film’s twist ending is equally shocking and satisfying, offering a palatable resolution to the narrative.

Personally, I enjoyed Le Jetée for the unique manner of storytelling it offered, and was enamoured by the unsettling dystopia of a post WW3 scenario. The black and white film stock utilised by Marker throughout the film further enhances the unsettling atmosphere created. The film demonstrated to me how still images can be used as an effective means of storytelling.

*The unnamed protagonist delving into his past*

Production Diary: A Girl’s Own Story (Jane Campion, 1984)

A Girl’s Own Story (Jane Campion, 1984) is a 27-minute Australian short film which explores the stage of female adolescence during the 1960s. Choosing to film in black and white, Campion displays the narrative by intercutting between multiple storylines. The film takes place in Australia, during the height of Beatlemania, in which two school friends – Pam and Stella – both kiss cutouts of Beatles members. Afterwards, one of the girls wears a mask of Ringo Starr before they practice kissing each other. This is intercut with scenes of another schoolgirl, Gloria, who is coerced by her brother into roleplaying as cats. In addition to this, the film also explores the relationship between Pam’s estranged parents, who use their daughters to communicate with each other.

A Girl’s Own Story immediately establishes the main ideas explored over the duration of the film. The opening scene involves a group of schoolgirls who observe an image of the male anatomy, which is displayed to the viewer through the use of a glance object. This introduces the viewer to the themes of sex and adolescence which are explored throughout. Campion’s decision to film in black and white with a 4:3 aspect ratio aptly reflects the aesthetic of the time period. This is further reinforced through Campion’s carefully selected mise-en-scène – particularly the costume design of the traditional schoolgirl uniform.

Voiceover is also used sparingly throughout the film, allowing the viewer to delve deeper into the minds of the three protagonists. Campion also interestingly chooses to conclude the film with a song that is sung by our three main characters: Pam, Gloria and Stella. Through this, the three girls are able to express their adolescent inner turmoil that is portrayed over the course of the film.

Personally, I did not receive much enjoyment from A Girl’s Own Story and found myself particularly disengaged from the events portrayed onscreen. The characters and themes of the film did not resonate with me, and I found the choice to conclude the film with a song to be somewhat schmaltzy. The film demonstrated to me the effectiveness of parallel narratives throughout a short film.

*The three protagonists singing during the final scene*

A Brief History Of Cinema

Cinema is a relatively new dominant art form, being around 130 years old. It is ever-evolving and was a revolutionary way in which humans could express themselves. It is also a knowable concept, due to the fact that the entire history of cinema is mapped out and is within our great-grandparents’ lifetimes.

*An early cinema – only one person was able to watch a film* *at a time*

The history of cinema starts in the 1800s, when photography was first invented. This was a revolutionary moment in history, as now you were able to capture a moment of reality. This was done through the process of exposing a camera obscura containing photosensitive chemicals to light. However, early photography took hours and the subject was forced to sit still for a prolonged period. Subsequently, photography quickly developed and soon enough became a business. Afterwards, people began to ponder the idea of moving images, and soon realised that if many images were sequenced together in rapid succession, it created the illusion of movement. This led to the production of early films – which were reminiscent of flip books.

By 1895, technologies were competing to produce moving images, however, it was a mere novelty at this point. There was no infrastructure, film now existed but was solely a “seaside attraction”. Despite this, film soon caught the imagination of the population and was consistently developed and commercialised. Two key pioneers for the film industry were the Lumiere brothers, who developed iconic early films such as Employees Leaving the Lumiere Factory and The Arrival of a Train. These short experiments did not tell a story of any kind, but merely showed the audience of the late 19th Century what film was capable of.

At this point in time, theatre was cheap entertainment and music halls were common place. As these attractions fell out of favour, music halls were replaced by cinemas and soon enough – every town had a cinema. Because of this, the snowball effect began to take place and there was a sudden explosion in both cinemas and film production. Particularly in America, film was recognised as an incredible business model and many entrepreneurs jumped straight to it. Filmmaking was quickly transformed into a factory assembly line in which the studio completed every task. This was known as vertical integration and the money was gained from the public. The American film industry was constantly competing to be bigger, better and have more assets and this was done by spending the most amount of money. Every stereotypical trait that Hollywood is associated with (glamour, scale, money etc.) originated from this point.

Another key trailblazer in the world of filmmaking was George Melies, who invented both substitution splices and double-exposure: two key techniques in modern day cinema. Melies’ most iconic work was A Trip To The Moon (1902) which made great use of both techniques.

During 1900-1910, cinema went from being the “theatre of attractions” to narrative-driven. Films were no longer a series of stills – technology had greatly advanced and full stories were being told. 35mm film was used to shoot, process and produce films. Physical film was used for mainstream cinema up until about 15 years ago until digital filming was used. In order for the human eye to be fooled into perceiving a sequence of images as movement, 24 images must be displayed every second.

By 1920, film was the most popular art form in the Western world due to the fact that it was accessible to everyone. However, colour and sound were problems to be solved. The idea of painting sets was briefly considered, but was deemed far too impractical. Dubbing was also attempted to solve the sound problem, but this didn’t work. At this point, all films were shot in 4:3 aspect ratio (square), as widescreen wasn’t considered until much later.

Throughout the later 20th Century, cinema continuously developed and many problems were solved. The first film with synchronised sound was released in 1927 and two key actors who were famous before and after sound were the comedy duo Laurel & Hardy. Film was used for World War propaganda, as well as many other commercial items.

However, the invention of the television instantly established itself as the main opponent for the film industry. Initially, TVs were far too expensive for the average person, but by the 1950s most average families owned a television. Ticket sales began to decline as there was no reason to go the cinema anymore when you could watch the latest films from the comfort of your own home.

The film industry constantly attempted to overcome the TV problem by initially making cinema screens much wider than TV screens. Going to the cinema now became a prestigious event, rather than a day-to-day activity. New films were additionally not shown on television until many months down the line, this was done to increase cinematic demand. The film industry also briefly dabbled in 3D, but this wasn’t commercially viable.

By the 1970s, VCR was a new competitor for the film industry and video rental shops, such as Blockbuster, dominated the market. As each new obstacle arose, cinema threw money at the problem to counteract it. However, this ultimately failed and by the 1980s, almost every cinema in the UK closed down.

In present day society, the film industry faces many opponents such as TV channels, internet and streaming services.

Cold War Hot Take

Cold War (Pawel Pawlikowski, 2018) is a Polish drama that explores the relationship between two characters: Zula and Wiktor during the period between the end of WW2 and the beginning of the Cold War. Throughout these years, we witness the tumultuous romance between Zula and Wiktor as their relationship develops and devolves throughout the duration of the film.

The film uses many interesting techniques to portray the time period accurately. Firstly, the film uses 4:3 aspect ratio, and it is also in black and white. These two cinematographic choices are typically associated with early filmmaking, due to the fact that these were the only options available at the time. This contributes to the film’s authenticity; as well as creating an aesthetically pleasing frame.

The film incorporates a number of prolepses throughout, which effectively and efficiently conveys the passing of time and emphasises how estranged the pair’s relationship becomes. Clever use of hair, costume design and makeup is also utilised to illustrate similar effects.

I personally reacted to the film in a mixed way. The film was consistently visually striking throughout and the performances (albeit in Polish) were excellent. However, I found myself losing interest periodically throughout the film due to the fact the events that took place throughout were relatively mundane, and the story didn’t particularly develop until the last 10 minutes. Although the arguments between the pair were compelling, I didn’t particularly connect with either character. Consequently, I didn’t have an investment in the film and this was detrimental to my overall opinion of it.

I think that the filmmakers were trying to emphasise the brutality of post-war life, as well as nullify the preconceived stigma of typical romance portrayed throughout cinema during this time period. Everything isn’t a happy love story, and Pawlikowski expertly conveys this message throughout the film.

Overall, I would rate Cold War ★★★½.