anderson – Otis Morley’s A-Level Film Studies Blog

Auteurs And Auteur Theory

Originating from the French masculine word for ‘author’, an auteur is defined as a film director who influences their films so much that they rank as their author. Auteurs possess full creative control over each of their respective works and thus, the viewer is able to identify a film as being part of an auteur’s filmography from a wide range of observable tropes, such as: patterns, repetition, and motifs.

The idea of ‘auteurship’ originated in the Cahiers du Cinema magazine (founded in 1951 by French film critic and theorist André Bazin) to praise directors that demonstrated particular artistic finesse within the studio system. The first auteurs included notable names such as Alfred Hitchcock and Orson Welles – names that are still ever-pertinent within cinema to this day.

Hitchcock established himself as an auteur through his groundbreaking implementation of filmic techniques, such as utilising lighter film cameras, allowing him to have fluid camera movements within a scene. This aided the viewer in becoming immersed within the viewpoint of a specific character, such as being able to empathise with the fear of heights that John Ferguson has in Vertigo (1958). Orson Welles is regarded by many as the “ultimate auteur”, utilising a range of revolutionary and innovative compositional techniques in order to convey narrative effectively. Welles’ scenes were often lit with high contrast, meaning that characters were often displayed completely in silhouette. This helped to create a looming sense of mystery and intrigue within his films.

*Welles’ use of high contrast lighting within Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1942)*

Auteurs are renowned by audiences for the ways in which each individual artist creatively utilises the elements of film form at their disposal. Including the likes of Christopher Nolan, some auteurs are regarded for their manipulation of narrative. Nolan often toys with the concept of time and space throughout his body of work. Other contemporary auteurs such as Wes Anderson are acclaimed for imbuing each of his films with meticulous symmetry alongside an opulently lavish aesthetic. His apt use of a pastel colour palette throughout The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014) is highly evocative as well as distinctively recognisable.

*Anderson’s use of symmetry and colour palette can be seen with The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014)*

Despite this, the concept of auteurship has been criticised by critics such as Pauline Kael, proclaiming that auteur theory “glorifies trash” and encourages directors to reproduce the same film time and time again. Kael argued that each film should be critiqued on its own merit, rather than solely due to a specific person creating it. Others have argued that filmmaking is a collaborative process, and auteur theory undermines the role of the crew. All credit garnered by the film is then placed under one singular name, and other creative minds who may have contributed towards the film are diminished.

The Grand Budapest Hotel: Representation

Throughout the film, Wes Anderson chooses to represent a variety of groups in a particular way. For example, Anderson chooses to expose our cultural understanding of the Nazis in order to depict the prominent “ZZ” fascist group throughout the film.

Without explicitly telling us, everything we need to know about this group is implicitly hinted at through the use of mise-en-scène and performance. The homogeneity of the costume design reiterates the uniformity of the fascist group. Alongside this, the performances are extremely well-choreographed and synchronised to emphasise this.

The film frequently focuses our attention towards the familiarly designed “ZZ” insignia which is extremely reminiscent of the SS Nazi police force. Through this, Anderson manages to use the shared understanding of this symbol to his advantage in order to silently represent the prominent fascist group in this way.

Another example of representation reinforced throughout The Grand Budapest Hotel is the differentiation in class. The lavishness of the hotel’s interior as well as the opulence of the guests purport a sense of aristocracy. Conversely, the appearance of the crippled shoeshiner emphasises the harsh reality of the working class during this time period.

*Difference in class represented within The Grand Budapest Hotel*

The Grand Budapest Hotel: Aesthetics

Throughout the film, Wes Anderson utilises a number of techniques in order to illustrate intriguing and enthralling aesthetics throughout.

Primarily, the implementation of three different aspect ratios create a distinctive aesthetic throughout the film. Anderson utilises a different aspect ratio to represent each time period. These include 1.37:1 (1932), 2.4:1 (1968) and 1.85:1 (1985). In effect, this subtly informs the viewer of the current scene’s time period.

Each aspect ratio was carefully chosen in order to accurately reflect the time period in which it represents. Beginning in the 1980s, the film utilises a standard widescreen aspect ratio which was typical of film during that specific time period. During the 1960s section, an anamorphic aspect ratio is implemented in order to indicate a sense of comfort and luxury during this point in Zero’s life. Finally, the majority of the film takes place during the 1930s in which the vintage ‘Academy Ratio’ is utilised to authentically represent the Golden Age of cinema during this time.

*Aspect ratios within The Grand Budapest Hotel*

Another aesthetic Anderson utilises is an enchanting colour palette. Making apt use of cremes, pinks, reds and beiges, Anderson diligently illustrates a vibrant and distinctive colour palette which astutely complements the film’s narrative and style.

In addition to this, the film intelligently makes use of zeitgeist in order to reiterate the time period as well as the opulence and aristocracy associated with it. Each and every costume worn by the actors is meticulously selected to insinuate a sense of authenticity.

*Colour palette and costume within The Grand Budapest Hotel*

Characteristic of Wes Anderson’s filmography, The Grand Budapest Hotel features a highly stylised utilisation of symmetry and framing. Throughout the film, Anderson typically establishes a symmetrically composed frame, through which a character or object will then enter. The viewer’s attention is then focused towards this object which is almost always centrally framed.

*Symmetry within The Grand Budapest Hotel*

The Grand Budapest Hotel: Performance

We were tasked to analyse the performances from the 4th and 5th chapters of The Grand Budapest Hotel. In class, we discussed the expressive use of voice, intonation, movement and physicality throughout.

The scene opens on a silhouette of M. Gustave (Ralph Fiennes) standing by a balcony. Through a diligent use of posture, he is depicted as a reflective and insightful person.

Throughout this sequence, Ralph Fiennes gives an extremely expressive performance as M. Gustave. He uses lots of hand gestures and other precise motions to oversee and instruct the hotel workers.

His performance can be described as instructive and clear, as well as naturalistic. Fiennes utilises a very particular way of speaking, which illustrates his character as a member of aristocracy. Gustave additionally establishes a tone of authority, through which he asserts himself as a self-assertive figurehead. His words are chosen conscientiously in order to meticulously instruct the members of the working class.

During the conversation with Madame D, Fiennes uses subtle gestures such as a smile in order to feign intrigue. Interestingly, his measured demeanour is shattered when he makes notice of her nail varnish. Gustave’s precise movements are abandoned during this revelation which gives the viewer an invaluable insight into Gustave’s true colours.

Fiennes’ movements throughout are choreographed and precise and are meticulously timed to Anderson’s predetermined camera movements. As the camera crabs left, Fiennes naturalistically glides left. Anderson additionally makes use of blocking throughout this sequence, Gustave is always centrally framed in order to emphasise his authority.

The Grand Budapest Hotel: Mise-en-scène

We were tasked to analyse the mise-en-scène from the 5th chapter of The Grand Budapest Hotel. In class, we discussed the partial and complete control of environment throughout the chapter.

Chapter 5: Lobby

It is important to establish the two key intentions the director attempted to achieve through the use of mise-en-scène throughout this sequence. Firstly, Wes Anderson’s first intended aim is to illustrate the opulence and grandeur of the hotel itself, emphasising the upper-class society of the time period. Secondly, Anderson attempts to present Gustave as an authoritative and self-assured figurehead through the use of mise-en-scène throughout.

From the very start, Gustave can be described as well-presented, well-groomed and polished. He dons an extravagant purple suit and bow tie and sports a meticulously slicked hairstyle, as well as a prominent moustache. All of this contributes to Gustave being perceived as a well-respected concierge in addition to being a member of aristocratic society. On the other hand, Zero dons a similar – albeit slightly askew – outfit, this is exemplified by a lop-sided “Lobby Boy” hat, as well as a fake moustache.

During the first scene of this chapter, Anderson utilises a range of flamboyant colours to reiterate the lavishness of the hotel itself. These include cremes, pinks and beiges as well as a generally snowy environment. Moreover, the lettering of the hotel sign is emblazoned in a flashy gold trimming which captures the audience’s attention.

During Gustave and Zero’s conversation, we cut to an appropriately dressed upper-class man having his shoes shined by a crippled working class boy, who is pictured as having scraggy clothes and dirty shoes. This emphasises the social divide presented to the viewer throughout the film. Moreover, the wagons parked outside the hotel contain a bountiful amount of luggage which purports a sense of immense popularity within the hotel.

*Social hierarchy in The Grand Budapest Hotel*

Inside the hotel, the interior is furnished with a vast array of luxurious decor, examples of which include crimson carpets and imported exotic plants. In addition, the entire lobby is grandly illuminated and every guest is well-presented and respectably dressed. There is a juxtaposition created between the wealth of the hotel and the mundanity of the workers’ duties.

During Zero’s interview, Gustave immediately deals with the multitude of interruptions by the hotel staff. Each staff member immediately moves out of Gustave’s way and astutely answers to his beck and call. This contextualises Gustave as a well-respected concierge and a force to be reckoned with.

*Lavish costume and set design within The Grand Budapest Hotel*

The Grand Budapest Hotel: Editing

We were tasked to analyse the editing from the 28th and 29th chapter of The Grand Budapest Hotel. In class, we discussed the deliberate and considered pacing and sequencing throughout the chapters.

Chapters 28-29: Second Copy of the Second Will

Anderson begins the chapter with an exterior extreme long shot of the hotel, in order to establish the setting. From this establishing shot, the viewer is informed of the fact that the rest of the scene will take place from within the hotel. After this, we enter a sequence of rapid straight cuts of items such as a bell, a pigeon hole and a shaker, all of which are embossed with the “ZZ” insignia. This montage-like sequence informs us that the fascist group are indeed present within the hotel.

We then cut to a sequence of fairly short continuity cuts during which Agatha presents the hotel guard with a Mendl’s cake. Simultaneously, the scene with M. Chuck is taking place, through which the two sequences of continuity editing become a parallel edit. Anderson then cuts to a single sequence of continuity editing of Agatha walking up the stairs and into the storeroom.

Anderson then makes use of a glance object shot, having Agatha glance at the note and subsequently cutting to a closeup of the note. This allows the viewer to read the note for themselves and understand the important details written upon it. We then cut to another two sequences of continuity editing (Agatha upstairs, Dimitri and M. Chuck downstairs) which converges in another sequence of parallel editing.

During the conversation between Dimitri and M. Chuck, Anderson makes use of an editorial technique known as an “insert”. We are shown the mugshot of Agatha to inform us of the fact that Dimitri is aware of her existence, however the characters on-screen are unable to see this. Afterwards, an unconventional chase sequence ensues between Dimitri and Agatha during which Wes chooses to avoid the use of edits and instead decides to implement longer takes, as well as camera movements. For example, Anderson uses a two-shot in place of a shot/reverse shot sequence to avoid editing.

After utilising two reaction shots for Dimitri and Agatha respectively, the viewer can empathise with the both of them. We then cut to another slow chase sequence in the hotel hallway in which Anderson employs long takes and infrequent edits. It is interesting to make note of the fact that the few cuts used are in time with the music. During this, parallel editing is present between the chase and the other ZZ soldiers pursuing Gustave and Zero.

Anderson then makes use of a zoom honing in on Gustave and Zero, during which the pace of editing quickens for chaotic effect. Afterwards, a shot/reverse shot sequence between Dimitri and Gustave takes place to establish continuity. A satisfying rhythm is created during this sequence when the men with guns enter through the expert use of cuts and sound design choices.

When the shooting ends, the pacing of the editing slows as the camera pans 90º between each of the characters. Another sequence of parallel editing takes then occurs depicting Zero running around the hotel as well as Agatha outside hanging on the ledge. Through this, Anderson makes use of cross cutting to emphasise the concurrency of the scene.

The Grand Budapest Hotel: Sound

We were tasked to analyse the sound from the 25th and 26th chapter of The Grand Budapest Hotel. In class, we discussed the deliberate and considered use of diegetic and non-diegetic sound throughout.

Chapters 25-26: The Remote Foothills

The first use of sound featured in the chapter is the implementation of Alexandre Desplat’s non-diegetic composed score. Featured throughout the entire duration of the two chapters, Desplat’s score can be described as dark in nature as well as layered. For example, the pulsing rhythm employed in the first scene perfectly matches the on-screen visuals. Furthermore, the utilisation of particular instrumentation such as a pipe organ foreshadows Gustave and Zero’s later visit to a church.

Anderson expertly makes use of layered diegetic wind sounds, as well as subtle ambient sound effects in order to attract the audience’s attention. The first scene also uses diegetic dialogue as well as emphasised diegetic sound effects attributed to Joplin’s character. Examples including the brandy bottle and the coat poppers attribute a sense of menace to his character.

It is also important to make note of the fact that only the objects of diegetic significance receive sounds, such as the coins as well as the crunching snow. During the startup of the motorbike engine, Anderson interestingly cuts off the sound as the shot cuts to the jarring train whistle. This is then followed by the non-diegetic narration from Zero, during which the other sounds decrease in the mix.

As the train comes to a halt, the diegetic sounds of hissing steam and brakes increase in the mix. During which, the repeated rhythmic pulsing score give the film a playful pace. The score reduces in the mix as the train door opens to reveal Henckels’s character. The emphasised diegetic sniffs inform the viewer that the ZZ is now aware of Gustave’s presence.

As we cut to an extreme long shot of the observatory, the mix becomes more echoey. The movement temporarily stops, during which the diegetic wind ambience is attributed. Due to the fact that the characters are far away, the dialogue decreases in the mix and increases as we move in closer. As a new character enters, the diegetic footsteps become gradually louder to focus our attention.

As our characters are instructed towards their next goal, the non-diegetic composed score rises in the mix to create a loud and dramatic atmosphere. Anderson then interestingly makes the stylistic choice to make the screeching of the cable car occur in time with the score. This exemplifies the rhythmic flow of the film and instills satisfaction within the viewer.

The score rises in the mix as the characters approach their destination. It also illustrates a sense of playfulness to perfectly match the cartoon-like nature of the characters. As the characters enter the church, the timbre of the now diegetic score becomes echoed a capella voices. As the characters sit down, the score lowers in the mix to a single voice to focus the viewer’s attention on the ensuing conversation between the characters.

The movement stops as we cut to the confession booth, in doing so the dominant sound that can be heard is the diegetic dialogue which is accompanied by a very low, mournful score. The score then slowly rises in the mix as Gustave makes the revolution that there is a second will. As the scene cuts to black, we are forced to picture the scene as we hear the diegetic sound of the body falling . As the chase ensues, the driving percussive elements of the score increase and proceeds to stop as the movement stops.

The Grand Budapest Hotel: Cinematography

We were tasked to analyse the cinematography from the 21st chapter of The Grand Budapest Hotel. We discussed each individual shot in class and analysed the employed cinematographic techniques throughout.

Chapter 21: Check-Point 19 Supply Depot

In the first long shot, Anderson establishes a symmetrical frame with in a frame. The ratio is 4:3 to inform the audience of the time period (1932). Our attention is then focused on a car which enters the frame towards the centre. The camera then pans 90º to the right, through which our attention is now drawn towards the manhole cover illuminated from above. The camera then dollies forward to allow the viewer to read the text on the manhole cover. Zero then enters the frame to the left and peers into the manhole.

Anderson then cuts to a symmetrically framed long shot of the prison cell interior, in which more frames within frames are featured. The lights then go out while the actors perform highly choreographed movements in order to escape. As the lantern is lit, the viewer’s attention is focused towards the hole in the ground. The camera then pedestals down, following the centrally framed lantern through the floor and into the tunnel.

We then cut to a centrally framed, symmetrically composed closeup of a conveniently illuminated and labelled button, expertly focusing our attention.

The camera then crabs right to reveal the labelled dumbwaiter, through which another frame within a frame is composed. The viewer’s eyes are drawn directly to this specific location, as a character then enters the frame through the dumbwaiter. The camera then crabs back left, resting on the symmetrically framed door. As the camera continues to crab left, we follow the running men as we come to rest on the ladder.

It then cuts to a symmetrically composed frame of the prison gallery, through which our attention is directed to the centre. The long ladder then descends through the established frame. We then cut to a different view of the ladder, which presents us with a labelled wall, in order to inform the viewer of the location.

Anderson cuts to the opposite 180º angle, breaking the 180º rule in the process. Through a symmetrically constructed frame within a frame, our attention is focused on the smaller frame through which a character appears. A shot/reverse shot sequence then takes place, between the escapees and the prisoner, in which the characters are framed appropriately.

We then cut to a wide shot through which the characters enter the frame. The camera pans 90º and rests on a labelled lift door. We then dolly forward into the guard bunk room. The frame is dimly lit and the shadows are meticulously framed as the characters nimbly navigate their way through the bunk room. The film then cuts to a low angle shot of the men crawling under the bunks.

We cut to a frame within a frame of the characters cutting the prison bars in sync. It then cuts to a wider shot in order to show the frame in the larger context of the prison wall. The characters then throw the long ladder outside.

Anderson cuts to a birds-eye-view shot which shows the colossal height of the building as well as the length of the ladder. The frame is conveniently lit to show the path. We then cut to an extreme long shot which shows the men climbing down the side of the building, emphasising the sheer size of the prison.

It cuts to a shot depicting the windows as the escapees climb along the edge, the camera then crabs right to show the progress. The frame within a frame features a conveniently labelled steam vent.

A wide shot is established to portray the laundry basket landing point, our attention is focused on this centrally framed area. The men enter the frame downwards through the vent which is lit from above. As the characters land, they are symmetrically placed. We then pedestal down to reveal a centrally framed trapdoor.

We then cut to a worms-eye view frame within a frame of the prisoners looking down the trapdoor. A sequence which alternates between birds-eye and worms-eye shots then occurs. The trapdoor remains consistent and the characters are symmetrically positioned.

The film cuts to a wide shot, through which a prisoner armed with a knife enters. We cut to a worms-eye view portraying the other characters’ reactions in which they are all still symmetrically placed. Finally, a birds-eye shot displays the aftermath of the stabbings.

The Grand Budapest Hotel Inspector

Throughout the film, Wes Anderson makes reference to a number of contextual ideas. These include:

Cultural/Social

What sort of person might have stayed at The Grand Budapest Hotel? What sort of lifestyle does the film evoke?

The hotel is home to many aristocratic, wealthy guests which reinforces the theme of class portrayed throughout the film.

The film evokes a life of extravagance and oozes style throughout. The vibrant colour palette emphasises the upper class society in which the inhabitants of the film are members of.

Historical/Political

Was there a real “Grand Budapest Hotel”? What inspired the filmmakers?

The “Grand Budapest Hotel” is indeed fictitious, however many elements of the film take influence from the style of Karlovy Vary, the colorful spa town in the Czech Republic, primarily the Grandhotel Pupp. In addition to this, the model of the hotel featured in the poster of the film, is the historic Bristol Palace Hotel.

*Grandhotel Pupp and Bristol Palace Hotel*

What key historical events are portrayed in the film?

The main historical event portrayed throughout The Grand Budapest Hotel is the stylistic portrayal of a fascist army which holds a strong resemblance to the Nazis. The costumes are emblazoned with a “ZZ” insignia not unlike the SS. It is interesting to make note of the fact that they are never referred to as “Nazis”, it is only subtly implied.

Institutional

How does The Grand Budapest Hotel fit into Wes Anderson’s canon of work?

The Grand Budapest Hotel is Wes Anderson’s eighth film and is considered by many to be his magnum opus. Through the use of an array of aspect ratios, an ostentatious colour palette and a vast ensemble cast, Anderson forges an unforgettable cinematic experience appreciated by critics and audiences alike.

Technical

What interesting technical techniques does Wes Anderson employ to tell the story?

Wes Anderson uses a number of techniques throughout the film such as lighting, depth of field and narrative editing in order to reflect Zero’s emotional recollection of events. Anderson often establishes a frame within a frame and focus the audience’s attention by having an object enter the frame, which is often accentuated by convenient lighting.

The Grand Budapest Hotel (Wes Anderson, 2014)

The Grand Budapest Hotel (Wes Anderson, 2014) is a crime/comedy detailing the adventure of an eccentric concierge and his newly befriended lobby boy protégé. The film contains an ensemble cast containing the likes of Ralph Fiennes, Bill Murray, Edward Norton and Saoirse Ronan to name but a few.

We follow an unnamed author (Jude Law) who is interviewing Zero – the owner of the prestigious Grand Budapest. We learn the story of M. Gustave (Ralph Fiennes), the famed concierge of the hotel and a young Zero (Gustave’s newly appointed protégé) in a daring and adventurous rags to riches quest.

Wes Anderson uses many interesting techniques throughout the film. Firstly, the narrative structure of the film is nonlinear as we flick back and forth between three key time periods: 1932, 1968 and 1985. Anderson expertly makes use of three different aspect ratios for each time period in order to subtly inform the viewer when each on-screen event is taking place.

*Use of aspect ratios in The Grand Budapest Hotel*

The film’s aesthetics are enchanting throughout. Anderson makes full use of the key elements of film form, predominantly the cinematography and mise-en-scène to produce a emphatic and flamboyant impact.

*Use of cinematography*, *framing and mise-en-scène*

Being only 7 years old at the time of writing, The Grand Budapest Hotel will surely become a cult classic in the future. The filmmaking is nothing short of masterclass and each shot of the film could be a framed piece of artwork. Wes Anderson’s legacy will surely inspire aspiring auteurs to shape the future of cinema.

The film explores themes of class and wealth throughout, emphasising the occupants of the hotel as being members of upper-class society and illustrating the employees as subservient.

Personally, I thoroughly enjoyed The Grand Budapest Hotel from start to finish. Each shot was visually breathtaking and the all-star ensemble cast were a joy to witness on-screen. However, I do personally believe that the plot at some points delved into the realm of being ‘convoluted for the sake of complexity’. Additionally, in my opinion, a large part of the film’s selling point is the eclectic cast and I think it would not be as critically acclaimed without it. In saying that, I would highly recommend the film to anyone purely from the aesthetics alone.

My favourite sequence would perhaps be the fantastic ski chase scene. Anderson intelligently makes use of many filmic elements – particularly editing and special effects to construct a tense and enthralling sequence.

Overall, I would rate The Grand Budapest Hotel ★★★★.